So I was sitting here tonight thinking. Not really about anything in particular… I’m just kinda burnt out from the week already. But anyways, I grabbed a copy of the Tao Te Ching off of my bookshelf and flipped to a random page. I turned to chapter 68. The first stanza of the chapter is as follows:
” The best warrior is never aggressive.
The best fighter is never angry.
The best tactician does not engage the enemy.
The best utilizer of people’s talents places himself below them. “
[ Tao Te Ching, translated by Charles Muller ]
[ published by Barnes & Nobles Classics ]
After reading these few lines, I sort of returned to sitting and thinking… digesting what these words were saying. The way I interpret this is that the best tactic in life is to let things come to you. “The best warrior is never aggressive”, if one is always on defense, there is no pressure to make anything happen. You deal with things as they occur, and prepare for the inevitable. “The best fighter is never angry”, one must remain cool-headed. As soon as anger sets in, you get sloppy. You interpret things wrong. You screw up. “The best tactician does not engage the enemy”, I interpret this similarly to the first line. A good tactician will never enter an open field, but will always hold the advantage of the high ground and wait for the enemy to approach. By not engaging, I’m going to assume that one should never actively engage in conflict, but simply wear the opponent out passively. Yup, that one’s foggy… The last line, “The best utilizer of people’s talents places himself below them”, to me at least, means that in order to best manage people in a group setting, you must first be humble and not look down on your peers or subordinates. By simply using the term ’subordinate’, that last line is contradicted. I just didn’t know what else to call them.
I feel that I should strive to live in this way. I have never really been one to “go with the flow”, really… no matter how many times I agree that it’s the best path, or how many times I tell others to “just roll with it”. I pretty much suck at rolling. I have lately had the mindset that if I don’t make something happen, it will never happen.
When I was home last weekend, my mom said something to me. CSI was on, so I’m not positive on the wording, but it was pretty much how I’m never happy with what I have, and am always trying to get more of something or trying to get something new. My current want is a Blackberry, which requires funding for both the handheld unit and the data and airtime plans. This is one of those new and shiny things that I want. A new tattoo is another. More hours for work is a third, even though there is a softly-defined maximum of 40 hours a week with no paid overtime. I’m not sure whether to call this greed, boredom, or something else. But she definitely has a point. I have never truly been happy with what I have. I have always wanted something more.
At some points in life this is a good thing. At work, I do my job. I do it right, and I do it in a timely manner. I have been told on multiple occasions this week that I (and a co-worker that has the same mindset in regards to the job) are on the ball, and are much more efficient than last year’s crew. I forget if I filled the world in on my job. I’m one of 12 people working for Villanova’s Summer Music program. I’m in charge of all of the A/V stuff, but also do whatever else needs done throughout the day and week. Turns out, I’m on the ball. That fits into the “always striving for more” category though. I’m always striving to be smarter at work and to utilize my time more efficiently.
But at the same time, always wanting more is a negative. I budget money out before I have it. I try to force things before anyone involved is ready for them to happen. I get stupid and try to put round pegs into square holes, and then are too frustrated to realize why things aren’t working. And while all that is going on, my patience runs thin for all of the wrong reasons, and I get sloppy. “The best warrior is never aggressive” fits in well here, as does “The best fighter is never angry”. Both of those statements are being directly contradicted here, and in doing so, the situations get exponentially worse as time progresses. All because I am a bad tactician and have engaged in things.
Now if only I could subscribe to those words and ideas. Imagine how much simpler things might be in my head. It’s funny, because half the time the person the warrior is aggressive to, the person the fighter is angry at, and the person the tactician has engaged… is all myself. Half of the time I’m engaging myself in an intricate tug of war, and in that particular situation, I always lose. Some tactician I am, eh?
Looks like I’m off to the war room to have a chat with my troops and battle planners.
.
.
Thanks for listening,
Tom. =)
